| | |  |
Novelty Games | Home » » Rubik's Revenge Cube 4 X 4 | | | | | | WARNING:| CHOKING HAZARD -- Small parts. Not for children under 3 yrs. | | CHOKING HAZARD -- Toy contains a marble. Not for children under 3 yrs. | | CHOKING HAZARD -- Children under 8 yrs. can choke or suffocate on uninflated or broken balloons. Adult supervision required. Keep uninflated balloons from children. Discard broken balloons at once. | | CHOKING HAZARD -- Toy contains a small ball. Not for children under 3 yrs. |
| | | Description: | | This Rubik's Cube is bigger, better and more mind-boggling. Building on the classic 3 x 3" cube, this larger model is 4 x 4" and requires some fun new twists and turns. Includes: Instruction booklet and a triangular stand. Billions of puzzle combinations but only 1 solution! | | | Features: | |
• Worlds #1 Puzzle
• 4 x 4" size to enhance play
• Hint book included
• Triangular stand also included
• Billions of puzzle combinations but only 1 solution!
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Length:
| 6.7 inches | | Product Width:
| 3.0 inches | | Product Height:
| 9.2 inches | | Package Length:
| 9.3 inches | | Package Width:
| 6.5 inches | | Package Height:
| 4.0 inches | | Package Weight:
| 0.55 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 62 reviews |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 62 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
43 of 45 found the following review helpful:
 A great challenge!Oct 28, 2007
By Modern Blue Argonaut
My 13 year old can solve the 3x3 cube in under a minute consistently, and was looking for a new challenge. I was happy to see this was only a few dollars more, and even happier it was made by Milton Bradley. It's been 4 days now and he cannot solve the 4x4 yet! It appears to be well made, and glide easily around the pivot. The price here on Amazon cannot be beat!
34 of 36 found the following review helpful:
The best 4x4 ever madeNov 01, 2007
By Jeremy
Finally a Rubik's brand 4x4 that doesn't pop or lock. If your a fan of the Eastsheen 4x4 clone, you'll find this cube just as smooth, but with the solid feel of the 4x4 product distributed by Winning Moves.
33 of 37 found the following review helpful:
And, no, I haven't seen "Pursuit of Happiness" yet, but I'll keep my eyes peeled.Apr 24, 2008
By My Uncle Stu
Of course you should follow your own interests and do what you enjoy, but there's also something to be said for having a few skills that seem more impressive than they are.
It's not that doing the Rubik's cube is easy, but it isn't as mysterious as it seems at first. It actually doesn't take a genius. There is a method for solving it, and it is learnable. It requires no more effort than solving one of those video games that you sit in your basement and play for hours with your buddies. A handful of your aimless buddies might be impressed when you beat a video game, but I promise it doesn't travel any further than that. Video games link a little bit more directly to your brain's reward system, with their immediate bonuses for good play and game-over consequences for mistakes. The cube might take a little bit more discipline to stick with, but it certainly won't take up any more time.
Being a bigger cube, with more moving parts- just 56 though, since the center is a sphere- Rubik's Revenge is easier to break. It's not conducive to trying to beat your previous time. You have to make sure all the planes are lined up before giving it a turn. The 4X4X4 seems like it would be much more complicated than the 3X3X3, what with 10 to the 45th possible permutations, versus just 10 to the 19th for the smaller version. But, in fact, it isn't much harder. Here's the trick, and stop reading if you want to figure it out on your own: any N cubed puzzle can be solved by simplifying it to the (N-1) cubed puzzle, and then just solving it from there. (I'm not pretending I figured this out on my own. There are countless blogs and videos devoted to this stuff. Getting help does not devalue the accomplishment. As I keep trying to say, even with the formulas, you still need to struggle and practice in order to really internalize how and why they work.) With the 4 across version, you solve the centers and pair up the edge pieces, then you never have to turn any sections down the midline plane, and the cube converts to a 3X3X3. It turns out any N cubed puzzle can be solved by reducing it to the N-1 cubed version. It's still a different skill and you have to play around with it to get the hang of it, but it's not like a black belt trying to move up a degree. It only took me a couple of weeks, although that did include an airport day. And, it isn't quite as simple as that sounds. There are a few distinctions that require different tricks. Since the 4X4X4 lacks fixed centers, there are a few possible novel situations that can come up called `parity errors.' It looks sort of like when someone takes apart the regular cube but puts the pieces back in wrong and it can't be solved. But the 4 cubed parity errors are solvable although they require some extra fancy little algorithms to memorize. People grumble about these algorithms on some of the web sites, but I actually find them very elegant, in their near-symmetry, with repetitive doings and undoings and minor little twists and turns putting things into place. I could sit and turn that into a metaphor for things in life but right now that feels like a boring idea. Springtime in New England.
I feel like I didn't really get the 3 block cube until I mastered the 4 block. The Rubik's 4X4X4 is fantastic. You will feel grandiose when you solve it, and most people will be impressed. Some percentage of people won't give you the satisfaction of being impressed, but it's still a positive accomplishment since it is always important exactly who those people are. Still, I continue to have trouble knowing what to say when people asked me how I learned it. I used to tell the truth but that leaves people disappointed, like finding out how a magic trick is done. So I've experimenting with various more mystical answers. I'll let you know if I settle on one.
5 of 5 found the following review helpful:
 Not durable!Mar 25, 2009
By Kiet A. Nguyen
Easy to be broken apart! not very smooth to spin, not that easy to put back! I don't think that Winning Moves is the best brand of Rubik's cube! I my self recommend eastsheen's cubes as they are smaller, easier to spin and is also cheaper!
4 of 4 found the following review helpful:
 4x4 CubeOct 24, 2008
By Shane L. Boshart
"SB"
The cube was not built very well at all. I had to put it back together twice before I could solve it without it falling apart.
See all 62 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|
